RE: Bombs and Bomb Squads in the Pentagon B4 the Attack on 9/11!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pan Man
Date: 05 Oct 2008, 17:56


Somebody knew that bombs had been planted to simulate a crashing airliner....I wonder where those 84 missing Pentagon Surveillance Tapes are? I'm pretty sure there are surveillance cameras in every hallway of the Pentagon as well.
I wonder what they show in the days and hours leading up to 9/11?????

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: jane
Date: Oct 5, 2008 3:29 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: The Last Baboon
Date: Oct 5, 2008 4:03 PM


..
Preuve d'une explosion a l'interieur du Pentagone
envoyé par project911..

RE: Pentagon ties to the media.

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: My Hate Speech3
Date: Apr 26, 2008 11:53 PM


VINCO VICI VICTUM
Date: Apr 26, 2008 11:20 PM

PBS breaks ‘media blackout’ of NYT story on Pentagon propaganda»

On Sunday, The New York Times published an explosive report exposing the Pentagon’s secret campaign to use analysts in order to “generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance-” Since that time, TV news organizations have largely been silent on their role in the propaganda- Ari Melber notes that last night, PBS’s Newshour finally broke this blackout, but couldn’t convince the other networks to participate:

JUDY WOODRUFF: And for the record, we invited Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and NBC to participate, but they declined our offer or did not respond-

Watch PBS’s segment here:

Digg It!



--------------------------
I dont think that anyone who looked at the facts unbiasly didnt think that the pentagon was using agents of the military industrial complex to propagate its campaign for the war. Its just sad that journalist had to sue the government to get these secrets out of them, at least the judicial branch still works. But hey, if these wars wern't a bad idea in the first place, then why would there be a need to reinforce such public opinion with such illegal actions? As a former strong supporter of this war, anyone who doesnt have questions about the legality and morality or these wars is uninformed or still gripped with un patriotic hymes about unity of thought and opinions.

RE: Rare Top Secret Footage Of Pentagon Explosion With No Plane

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Leo Krayola Endorses RONPAUL2008.com U should too!
Date: Dec 27, 2007 6:26 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Project Awaken
Date: Dec 27, 2007 5:23 PM


Rare Top Secret Footage Of Pentagon Explosion With No Plane in Sight

Something the american government dosnt want you to see

..

The post that never ends

RE: RE: RE: RE: Heres the VIDEO GOOGLE pulled down

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: ♥ Angel ♥ ™ ~For Truth~
Date: May 27, 2007 5:48 AM


From: Truth Seeker



Thanks to all of the following:
A.W.O.L.(from the world)
THE FOUR HORSEMEN


JR
Jerry
Abr4ham
§ Lori §
9/11 Truth of Northwest Florida
TimeBomb
Mark1
BadGalSal
Thanks
Anthony (Namaste)

Here's the video that Google Video pulled down!





more info & pics

Subversionary

everytime i look at this i see something new that catches my eye.

Thanks and please add project-freewheelin & friends

Add as well Revolutionary Mercury

Also add Paul (Investigate 911)

CONTROLLED DEMOLITION EVIDENCE:



















PENTAGON MYSTERY PLANE:




THE FBI RELEASED THESE 5 FRAMES OF SURVAILANCE VIDEO! (WHERE IS THE PLANE?)



WHAT THE VIDEO SHOULD HAVE LOOKED LIKE!






RARE PHOTO BEFORE THE ROOF EVEN COLLAPSES





AFTER THE ROOF COLLAPSES!










HOW COULD A PLANE GO THREW THIS MANY FEET OF STEEL AND REINFORCED CONCRETE? (hint: "IT CANT"!!! A MISSLE CAN THO!!)









THIS IS THE GOVERNMENTS ILLUSTRATION OF THE PLANE @ PENTAGON
(note: THE PLANE NEVER EVEN LEFT A SCRATCH ON THE LAWN, YET GOVERNMENT EXPLAINS THAT THE PLANE BOUNCED OFF THE GROUND BEFORE IMPACT, THUS THE REASON THE ROOF WAS NEVER DAMAGED!)





OBVIOUSLY THE PENTAGON IS UNDER MASSIVE 24hr. SURVAILANCE, AS WELL AS THE MANY CAMERAS ON THE HIGHWAY, HOTELS AND SURROUNDING GAS STATIONS! SO WHY ONLY THE 5 SHITTY FRAMES OF VIDEO, THAT SHOW NO PLANE WHATSOEVER?




WHAT IS THIS MYSTERIOUS PIECE OF WRECKAGE HIDDEN UNDER THE BLUE TARP?






THE WTC 7 MYSTERY (note* This Building was NEVER even HIT by a PLANE) (note 2: THIS BUILDING ALSO HOUSED THE MAYORS EMERGENCY CONTROL ROOM!!! THIS FACT IS MORE DISTURBING THEN YOU MAY THINK, PLEASE GOOGLE "WTC 7" FOR MORE INFO)
















AND YET ANOTHER MYSTERY:
THE PENNSYLVANIA CRASH OF FLIGHT 93 and the DISSAPPEARING PLANE, PASSENGERS, BODY PARTS AND WRECKAGE!!!






THIS IS THE DEBUNKING OF THE "PLUME" PHOTO TAKEN BY A SUPPOSED WITNESS TO THE PLANE CRASH OF FLIGHT 93.

RE: Pentagon Backtracks as Advocacy Groups Blast Ethnic Profilin

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: The Man Common
Date: Apr 29, 2007 8:05 AM

    Pentagon Backtracks as Advocacy Groups Blast Ethnic Profiling
    By William Fisher

    Go To Original

    As a new report charged that the US Department of Homeland Security is illegally delaying the citizenship applications of thousands of immigrants by profiling Muslims and subjecting them to indefinite security checks, a major American-Arab advocacy group launched a campaign to end a controversial post-9/11 program it says discriminates against Muslim visitors to the US.

    In a surprise move, the Pentagon itself announced it wants to close the domestic terrorism spying venture known as Threat and Local Observation Notice (TALON). The program has been attacked by civil and human rights organizations for collecting information on peaceful activists inside the United States.

    According to a Pentagon spokesman, the new undersecretary of defense for intelligence, James Clapper, found "disappointing results" during a review of the TALON database.

    Clapper "has assessed the results of the TALON program and does not believe they merit continuing the program as currently constituted, particularly in light of its image in Congress and the media," Ryder said.

    The Pentagon acknowledged last year that part of the information collected in the database "either should have been purged, or was data that was not appropriate for reporting in that system."

    The TALON program began in 2003 to track suspects with possible links to terrorists as part of the post-9/11 "war on terror."

    But information leaked to news reporters revealed that the Pentagon was collecting information on peace activists and monitoring antiwar protests across the country.

    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) last year filed several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking to uncover the identities of peace groups being spied on by the Pentagon.

    The filing was on behalf of several national groups and seven Florida-based peace activist groups, including Florida members of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), a Quaker religious-based peace group.

    "We found there were any number of things with respect to that program where ... data that was maintained in a database probably should not have been maintained there," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman.

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates reportedly has not yet made a formal decision to shut down the program.

    TALON has also attracted the wrath of influential members of Congress. For example, Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, says, "There are ways to protect defense facilities and military personnel without this kind of overreaching." He lauded the Pentagon's will to put an end to the program.

    "TALON was another costly, controversial and poorly focused venture that did not make us any safer," Leahy said.

    "Without clear rules and close oversight, databases like this can easily be abused to violate the public's constitutional and privacy rights," he added.

    At the same time, a new report from the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) at the New York University School of Law charges that the US government is illegally delaying the naturalization applications of thousands of immigrants by profiling individuals it perceives to be Muslim. The report documents the impact of expanded security checks on the lives of those experiencing citizenship delays, often for years.

    The report - "Americans on Hold: Profiling, Citizenship, and the War on Terror" - analyzes these delays and their impact within an international human rights framework. It offers specific policy recommendations to help end discrimination in access to citizenship and other human rights violations.

    "Citizenship delays are not just bureaucratic inconveniences; they are the result of discriminatory, ineffective, and undemocratic policies that violate fundamental human rights," said Professor Smita Narula, CHRGJ's Faculty Director.

    "In the name of fighting a 'war on terror,' the government is breaking up families, engendering fear and insecurity, and disenfranchising entire communities," he says.

    The report contends that since the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 "US immigration policy has been heavily influenced by counterterrorism efforts. The government has folded immigration bodies into national security institutions and has institutionalized a policy of discrimination against immigrants perceived to be Muslim on the basis of their name, race, religion, ethnicity or national origin."

    It says, "Increased security checks in the citizenship application process, manifested in a substantial expansion of FBI name check procedures, have illegally delayed the processing of applications from Muslim, Arab, Middle Eastern and South Asian men."

    The result, the report says, is that "Thousands of immigrants have chosen the United States as their new home; they abide by US laws, pay US taxes, contribute to our nation's economy, and strengthen its multicultural foundations. They have passed every test and fulfilled every requirement related to the naturalization process, but continue to wait for security clearance on their application. In response to repeated inquiries to immigration authorities, applicants are simply told that their application is pending security clearance.

    The organization quotes one applicant as saying, "They only have two words for us: 'security check.' That's it." Another is quoted as recounting, "I have been to Federal Plaza (ten times), and the supervisor there told me, 'It could be one day or it can be 99 years.'"

    The report alleges that individuals experiencing citizenship delays are unable to file visa petitions for their immediate relatives; are greatly hindered in their ability to travel to see sick relatives, and often endure restrictions on their ability to work or receive lifesaving benefits.

    Federal law requires the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), now part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to grant or deny citizenship within 120 days of an applicant's examination. USCIS has also set a policy goal of processing applications within six months from the time of filing.

    But the CHRGJ report says that DHS data "reveals that more than two-thirds of the over 2.2 million applications filed since April 1, 2001 were not processed within 180 days; more than 776,000 applicants had been waiting for more than a year; approximately 158,000 applicants had been waiting for more than two years; while approximately 41,000 had been waiting for three years or more."

    According to the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman, prolonged name checks "significantly delay adjudication of immigration benefits for many applicants, hinder backlog reduction efforts, and rarely, if ever, achieve their intended national security objectives," the report says.

    Jaycee Huckerby, CHRGJ's research director, says, "Discriminatory profiling is illegal under international law and is a poor substitute for real intelligence work. Taking years to identify individuals who are security threats does not make us safer. Ensuring timely and good faith completions of background checks will help the US advance its national security goals."

    Huckerby adds, "As a State party to the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the US is obligated to ensure nondiscrimination in access to citizenship as well as other human rights. A number of expert human rights bodies have affirmed that the "war on terror" cannot be invoked to deny noncitizens' rights."

    She points out that profiling affects a number of human rights, including the right to liberty of movement, the right to profess and practice religion, and the right to nondiscrimination in access to public health and social services.

    "Profiled immigrants may be stopped, delayed, detained and subjected to extended and unnerving security checks while traveling. Prior to September 11, 2001 the list of individuals suspected of terrorism and banned from air travel contained only 16 names; as of October 2006 the "no-fly" list contained 44,000 names. Airport officials are reportedly required to stop anyone with a "Muslim name" and name-check that individual against the list. Airport computers throw up red flags even when names are merely similar to those found on the list," the CHRGJ report charges.

    "Muslim immigrants or those perceived to be Muslims (such as members of the Sikh community) have also altered their physical appearance for fear of being profiled. Many immigrants have curtailed the extent to which they pray or worship publicly, and some have even changed their names - the very hallmark of their religious and cultural identity. Delays also affect the ability of naturalization applicants to receive lifesaving benefits, and in turn their access to healthcare and food."

    Meanwhile, other advocacy groups are demanding an end to what they describe as DHS-sponsored anti-Muslim programs. One of them is known as NSEERS - the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System.

    For example, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) has launched an advertising campaign called, "End the Shame of NSEERS." Its objective is "to shed light on the continuing problems faced by thousands of individuals as a result of the discriminatory and poorly constructed and implemented 'Special Registration Program.'"

    ADC's ads are appearing this month in the Arab American News, the largest and oldest Arab American newspaper in the United States; in Washington Monthly Magazine, and in the program of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 2007 Hubert H. Humphrey Civil Rights Awards Dinner.

    In the ads, ADC calls on President George W. Bush, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to terminate the NSEERS program and address its negative residual effects.

    Launched by the Department of Justice in late 2002 and later transferred to the newly organized Department of Homeland Security, NSEERS requires male visitors to voluntarily comply with the program. But ADC says, "Failure to adequately publicize the program and to train immigration officers sufficiently led to poor implementation of NSEERS. Thousands of men who were required to register failed to do so - many, no doubt, due to lack of notice - and are now vulnerable to NSEERS penalties."

    The organization charges that "Hundreds of individuals who had voluntarily appeared to register at Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) offices around the country were arrested and detained without reasonable justification."

    The program was initially portrayed as an anti-terrorism measure that required male visitors to the US (from 25 Arab and Muslim countries and North Korea) to be fingerprinted, photographed and questioned by immigration officers. At the time, INS officials acknowledged they were ill-prepared to carry out this special call-in registration and acknowledged numerous shortcomings. However, despite DHS's suspension of a few requirements in 2004, there were, and still are, criminal and civil penalties associated with failure to comply with NSEERS, including arrest, detention, monetary fines and/or removal from the United States.

    INS was renamed and became part of the Department of Homeland Security upon its founding after the passage of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.

    Civil liberties organizations have said that NSEERS was so poorly conceived and badly managed that it created chaos and fear. Trust between the immigrant community and law enforcement was severely strained, and in the end, there was no evidence that any terrorists were apprehended as a result of the effort.

    ADC has noted that "Approximately 84,000 Arabs and Muslims registered voluntarily, and subsequently about 14,000 were subjected to deportation hearings for voluntarily complying with the program. Yet, no registrants were charged with terrorism. In December 2004, the NSEERS program was modified by DHS, but many elements remain and are subject to abuse, including: departure registration; registration at ports of entry, as well as the potential for re-initiation of the call-in phase."

    The organization says, "It seems clear that NSEERS has become just another tool used in immigration enforcement and law enforcement in general, which raises serious constitutional issues, as the program clearly discriminates on the basis of national origin."

    ADC adds that several members of Congress, including key members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and numerous civil libertarians and immigrant rights advocates, have taken issue with the constitutional legality of NSEERS discrimination based on national origin.

---

    William Fisher has managed economic development programs in the Middle East and in many other parts of the world for the US State Department and USAID for the past thirty years. He began his work life as a journalist for newspapers and for The Associated Press in Florida. Go to The World According to Bill Fisher for more.

 

Who needs one Pentagon when you can have two!!

RE: The US network of underground cities & bases has a Pentagon2

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Apr 20, 2007 10:18 AM


The US network of underground cities & bases has a Pentagon2

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pan Man
Date: Apr 20, 2007 7:13 AM


One of the earliest American underground facilities was built at Raven Rock in Pennsylvania. The military refer to it as "Site R." Sounds like "Section D." Raven Rock was picked because it is made of greenstone, a type of granite that is the fourth hardest rock on earth. Construction started in 1950, and engineers had completed a series of tunnels and a three-story building by 1953. Two more three-story buildings were completed by 1963. The complex lies 650 feet beneath the 1,529-foot-high summit of Raven Rock and can be entered through four portals. The mountain has everything needed to survive a catastrophe: cars, some of the best dining in the Army, chemical suits, a fitness center, a medical facility, a barbershop, legal services, a chapel, designated smoking areas and a convenience store. It has six 1,000 kilowatt generators and 35 miles of cable on 180 telephone poles. Remember, this is one of the early underground sites, and probably does not compare with some of the new underground cities that have been constructed in more recent years.
One of the first of nearly 100 Federal Relocation Centers was built in rural Virginia's Mount Weather. It took years to complete, but when complete resembled a city more than an emergency installation. Mount Weather was equipped with such amenities as private apartments and dormitories, streets and sidewalks, cafeterias and hospitals, a water purification system, power plant, and general office buildings. The site includes a small lake fed by fresh water from underground springs. It even has its own mass transit system - small electric cars that run on rechargeable batteries and make regular shuttle runs throughout the city.

As recently as 1992, the papers reported the existence of a Cold War secret, the government had built a $14 million underground bunker in West Virginia and maintained it for more than three decades for Congress to use in the event of a nuclear attack. The hideaway Capitol was built under the fashionable Greenbrier resort in White Sulphur Springs, about 250 miles from Washington. Its location was known only to a relative handful of the nation's highest-ranking officials. From 1958 on, the very existence of this facility was a closely guarded secret. Very few in Congress or the executive branch knew of the program. The rumors that an underground city exists under the Enchantment Resort in Boynton Canyon in Sedona, Arizona may not be so far fetched after all. Eggs cannot be put in one basket. The Greenbrier bunker has living quarters and work space for 800 people as well as separate meeting halls for the House and Senate.

We are always willing to release more about the other side's secrets than our own. We find that the Kremlin and other buildings in Moscow are still linked by underground rail tunnels to an area about six miles outside the city center called Ramenki, site of a vast subterranean bunker designed for the country's leaders and their families. It was described as an underground city about 500 acres in size, built at several levels from 230 feet to 395 feet. This bunker could shelter as many as 120,000 people! That is the size of a moderate American city.

According to the Napa Sentinel, a secret underground installation is under construction near the Oakville Grade in Napa County, California, and is being used by the Government for direct satellite communication, the Continuity of Government (COG) program in case of nuclear attack or other disasters, and secure communication links with the outside world in case of disaster. Mysterious helicopter flights have been seen going into and out of the area. Supposedly, the secret government site is replacing other installations and combining them into one underground center.

Not all underground sites are shelters. The Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project took a first step in November, 1993 when it started construction on the entrance pad for its Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF). This pad is the launching point for 14 miles of tunnels that will be drilled directly under Yucca Mountain. The tunnels will measure 24-30 feet in diameter for some and 16-18 feet in diameter for others. This project will eventually cover some 70 acres of surface and underground facilities. This DOE project will contain alcoves for experiments located along the tunnels.

Skeptics have expressed doubts about the existence of extensive underground tunneling and cavitation. They always ask, "Where is all the dirt?" This method of asking a question to disprove an allegation is misleading and faulty logic at best. Skeptics favorite question about the alien presence is "Why don't they land on the White House Lawn?" Of course, the rejoinder should be "Keep off the Grass signs prevent them." One of the new methods of tunneling that have been under study is "nuclear tunnel boring." U.S. Patent No. 3,693,731 dated Sept. 26, 1972 describes a method and apparatus for tunneling by melting. It says, "a machine and method for drilling bore holes and tunnels by melting in which a housing is provided for supporting a heat source and a heated end portion and in which the necessary melting heat is delivered to the walls of the end portion at a rate sufficient to melt rock and during operation of which the molten material may be disposed adjacent the boring zone in cracks in the rock and as a vitreous wall lining of the tunnel so formed. The heat source can be electrical or nuclear, but for deep drilling is preferably a nuclear reactor." The melted rock is forced into cracks wherein heat is given up to the crack surfaces and freezes as a glass at some distance from the penetrator. This amazing boring device is capable of drilling at depths totally inaccessible with previous drilling techniques, even, according to the patent claims, down to 30,000 meters.

The nuclear tunnel boring machines were invented by scientists and engineers at Los Alamos. They called their new machine, the "Subterrene." In 1975, a cost comparison was done between the Subterrene and other tunneling methods by A. A. Mathews, Inc. This report reveals that the initial experiments utilizing this technology were done in the early 1960s. This study reveals that the Subterrene performs its job rapidly and economically. The report states that the economy comes from "the formation of a glass lining bonded to the ground and capable of providing initial and final ground support without the delay and cost of separate installations. The use of a nuclear reactor and heat pipes to provide power for kerf penetration within the tunneling machine itself contributes to the overall economy of the system and is considered exclusively in this study. Nuclear power is not, however, a requirement for Subterrene tunneling." In fact, a Los Alamos symposium held in Atlantic City in 1986 proposed the construction of a Subselene for tunnel melting for high-speed lunar subsurface transportation tunnels.

Thomas spoke about a subterranean highway through America just like our own Interstate highway system, except its underground. The underground highway uses trucks, cars, and buses driven by electric motors. You wouldn't want gasoline fumes polluting tunnels. He mentioned another style of transport for freight and passengers that is linked together in a world-wide network called the "Sub-Global System." It has check points at each country entry. There are shuttle tubes that "shoot" the trains at incredible speed using a mag-lev and vacuum method. They travel in excess of the speed of sound. Did Thomas concoct this from a science-fiction scenario or does such a system have a basis in fact, and, if so, how much more of what Thomas has told us exists in reality?

Engineers Robert Salter and Frank P. Davidson of MIT have both discussed and given papers on the Planetran concept for moving people rapidly underground. Salter describes the Planetran as an ultraspeed, electromagnetically propelled and levitated transportation system of the future. Such a system could carry passengers across the United States in less than an hour in a quiet, economical, fuel-conservative, and nonpolluting manner. Planetran would require a tunnel over 2,500 miles in length, perhaps assembled from 100 25-mile long segments.

Skeptics have scoffed at claims that 100-mile long tunnels ran from one military operations area to another. Yet, engineers have planned for tunnels to span the nation. Of course, skeptics are somewhat deficient in imagination when it comes to accomplishments. There were skeptics that never believed we would reach the moon, and certainly not by rocket. Skeptics do not believe in alien visitations. It is even more difficult for them to accept the idea that aliens have inhabited the earth for a long time and like to live underground and out of sight.

Huge structures discovered in close-up photos of lunar features indicate that ancient alien artifacts have graced the surface of our satellite. It is only a small step for aliens to have come to earth and built habitats.

We cannot prove that aliens or alien technology exists in secret underground facilities constructed by the government. We have not been able to prove the existence of Section D. There are an increasing number of abductees who report being taken to underground bases. Some of these abductees have described seeing things that really exist in documented underground facilities. Perhaps ancient underground facilities will eventually reveal the truth. The magic and mystery of these dark places continues.

(reprinted with permission)