RE: Senate Leader Harry Reid Admits Income Tax is VOLUNTARY

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Lori
Date: Dec 4, 2008 9:43 AM


From: MAX FAN (Cowboys/LSU/Ron Paul2012/NASCAR)
Date: Dec 4, 2008 8:07 AM


I believe most of the thieves in government are informed to never say Mandatory when it comes to income taxes because it IS actually Voluntary to file and pay income taxes. Remember.............EVERYTHING collected on April 15 does NOTHING but pay the interest on the debt................so said Senator Pete Domenici, of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
They KNOW where our tax money is spent!

It's hard to keep one's lies straight when it becomes second nature to never tell the truth.
Witness this fool believing that we've all been successfully dumbed down enough to actually believe words don't have meanings!




INCOME TAX & FILING A RETURN IS VOLUNTARY - Says the IRS!

VERY IMPORTANT! PLEASE COPY & SAVE - Put this in your Freedom or Patriot folder on your computer and keep and spread!



Not only is there no law that requires the average American Citizen wage earner to pay an Income Tax, there is certainly no law that requires one to give up his 5th Amendment Constitutional Right to bear witness against himself as when he files a tax return! When you sign anything UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY you are waving your 5th Amendment Right. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO THIS! Our Founders were protecting us against just such shenanigans as this.


It’s like listening to a cop read you the Miranda Warning (the right to remain silent etc.) when they arrest you and you giving up those rights and talking to them.
YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED BY LAW TO DO THIS! PERIOD!

The following information is directly from the Beast’s mouth. These are IRS handbooks I ordered back in the early ‘80’s. The Constitution has not changed since then, so the statements still apply. The IRS knows that they can’t require you to give up your Constitutional Rights, that’s why they tell you, themselves, that filing a return is voluntary! These statements are at the beginnings of each of these books or sections. They spell it out in plain English.
They are hoping, I guess, that they’ve successfully dumbed us sheep down to the point that we don’t know what voluntary means or can locate a dictionary to remind us!

Let’s see what the Merriam-Webster dictionary says:

- Voluntary : proceeding from the will or from one's own choice or consent
- Compliance : a: the act or process of complying to a desire, demand, proposal, or regimen or to coercion b: conformity in fulfilling official requirements

So……….. Voluntary Compliance in these IRS matters means – fulfilling official requirements from one’s own choice or consent.
IT’S YOUR CHOICE!


** This first photo is from the IRS’ Audit Guidelines Handbook. When they say “Service” they mean the Internal Revenue Service. The underlined parts are what is important.





** These next two are from their Criminal Investigations Handbook.







** These next two are from their Special Agents Handbook. Remember, liquor distillers, tobacco merchants and a few others ARE required to file returns, just not us wage-earning citizens. This is where they try to confuse us. Also, the courts have ruled in tax cases that “shall” means “may.” “Shall” doesn’t mean “required,” it means you may or you may not.







** I wrote my senators and congressman and asked them if we were REQUIRED to file a tax return, and again, the IRS tells my congressman that it’s voluntary.
Can you feel the arrogance coming from this squirrel? Can you spot the lies?




** This is an article from the Wall Street Journal, 20 years ago! Has anything changed? Everyone knows that the Income Tax is voluntary except us sheep at the bottom, I guess! LOL Are there also penalties for not volunteering to contribute to the United Way or Toys for Tots? Can you believe the scam and smoke and mirrors that we have been living under?




** You will not see Voluntary Compliance attached to any “real” law. You won’t find it near laws for Murder, Robbery, TREASON, Kidnapping or Traffic laws. Why? Because the United States Constitution doesn’t protect us from these like it does from Bearing Witness Against Ourselves with our 5th Amendment. The IRS and Congress who writes this crap know the law, this ain’t by mistake! This is by design to keep us enslaved, period! End of discussion! Please pass this on far and wide. We need to return to Constitutional government like Ron Paul espouses. Thanks.




..

I believe banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies! If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, 1st by inflation, then by deflation, the banks & corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
~ Thomas Jefferson 1802



BECOME A LIBERTARIAN - STAND FOR SOMETHING!

TOM CRYER - LAWYER WHO BEAT THE IRS (Watch all the videos)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: Excellent Correspondence to an IRS Summons

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Nov 29, 2008 12:38 AM


Excellent Correspondence to an IRS Summons
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Joseph
Date: Nov 28, 2008 11:31 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Mothersbow
Date: Nov 28, 2008 4:56 AM


Excellent Correspondence to an IRS Summons



=================================
Prepare. Persist. Prevail.

http://www. preferredservices. org
Click here to subscribe to the free e-letter, Paycheck Piracy
..

================================


The IRS is stepping up its unauthorized, unlawful attempt to enforce
collection of a tax for other than Subtitle E.
Enforcement authority
is located in IRC section 7608.
The IRS is commencing foreclosure
proceedings in the United States District Courts (USDC) across the
country on real property for which the IRS has issued a fraudulent,
uttered instrument: Notice of Federal Tax Lien.


Instead of filing the complaint in the county court where the real
property is located, the IRS is performing its unlawful land grab
in the USDC's.


Below is extracted in part from certified mail sent September 2008
to the IRS counsel who threatened to file suit against the writer in
USDC if the writer failed to comply with an in office administrative
summons to produce books and records on a scheduled date later in
September 2008.


Read #21 through #29 about tax assessments, tax liens and tax
wage garnishment.


Results: The writer refused to appear at the administrative summons
hearing, the IRS counsel failed or refused to rebut the writer's
correspondence, and no further attempt to unlawfully enforce
collection of tax or excise under section 7608 of the internal
revenue code has been taken against the writer.





----------

You, as an employee of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, a collector
for the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, as well as an active member of
the State Bar of California and the U.S.
Tax Court, should be able
to answer this simple question:
"Do you have evidence of any known legal duty requiring me,
a non-federally connected private sector man, to comply
with your employer's administrative summons requesting me
to appear or requiring me to produce any books, records
or other documents called for on an administrative request
for information Form 2039-Summons that does not contain an
OMB number?"
Yes or No

The following is a reasonably concise list of causes for challenging
and requiring you to verify your lawful authority and for you to
bond your action.
The list includes authority references sufficient
to provide notice and enable you to make inquiry reasonable under
the circumstance.
Do you disagree?

1.
After exhaustive study of internal revenue laws of the
United States, I have concluded that very few private sector
men and women and private sector domestic corporations,
partnerships, etc.
, are liable for federal income taxes
imposed by Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code that
require keeping books and records and filing returns.

Do you disagree?

2.
Taxing and liability statutes do not apply to income
sources and activities of private sector Americans and
private sector domestic juristic entities other than those
who receive income from foreign sources, insular possessions
of the United States, and maritime activity regulated by
treaty or trade agreement.
Do you disagree?

3.
Employment (social welfare) taxes imposed by Chapter
21 of the Internal Revenue Code are mandatory and elective
only in possessions of the United States.
See definitions
of "State", "United States" and "citizen" at 26 CFR
§ 31.3121(e)-1.
Do you disagree?

4.
However, Congress has enacted legislation that permits
federal employees to participate in these social welfare
programs; legislatures of States of the Union have enacted
legislation that authorizes state governments and their
respective political subdivisions to participate in federal
social welfare programs.
Do you disagree?

5.
There is no corresponding provision that extends to
the private sector population in States of the Union.

Do you disagree?

6.
The Constitution of the United States does not authorize
Congress to tax one for the benefit of another so social
welfare taxes are beyond the scope of constitutionally
enumerated powers.
Do you disagree?

7.
Further, social welfare taxes are direct taxes that
fall within the scope of the apportionment clause; they do
not fall within the scope of the uniformity clause.
The
Sixteenth Amendment did not alter or otherwise affect
distinction between the two.
Do you disagree?

8.
Chapter 24 of the Internal Revenue Code does not impose
a tax, but merely authorizes withholding of Subtitle A &
C income and employment taxes from wages of employees, as
defined at 26 U.S.C.
§ 3401(c), by employers, as defined at
26 U.S.C. § 3401(d).
Chapter 24 withholding at the source
provisions are exclusively applicable to governmental
entities and government personnel.
Do you disagree?

9.
In order to withhold from wages, the employer must
first receive the Form 8655 reporting agent certificate
from the Treasury Financial Management Service then file
the completed form with the Andover office of the Internal
Revenue Service.
See § 3. 0. 258. 4 (11/21/97) of the Internal
Revenue Manual, January 1999 edition on CD.
Do you disagree?

10.
Court documents and published district and circuit court
decisions verify that the Internal Revenue Service is agent
of the [federal] United States of America, not Government
of the United States. (See 26 U.S.C.
§ 7402: "The district
courts of the United States at the instance of the United
States shall have jurisdiction .").
Do you disagree?

11.
Court records therefore verify that Internal Revenue
Service personnel are agents of a foreign government and
all Internal Revenue Service claims are made on behalf of
a government foreign to the United States and States of
the Union.
Do you disagree?

12.
For distinction between the "United States" and
the "United States of America" as unique and separate
governmental entities, see historical and revision notes
following 18 U.S.C.
§ 1001 and Attorney General delegation
orders to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, 28 CFR
§§ 0.96 (custody of prisoners of the United States) & 0.
96b
(transfer of United States of America prisoners to United
States custody).
Do you disagree?

13.
The Internal Revenue Service, successor of the Bureau of
Internal Revenue, was not created by Congress, as required by
Article I § 8, clause 18 of the Constitution of the United
States, so cannot legitimately enforce internal revenue
laws of the United States in States of the Union.
(See
Statement of IRS organization at 39 Fed. Reg.
11572,
1974-1 Cum. Bul. 440, 37 Fed. Reg.
20960, and the Internal
Revenue Manual 1100 through the 1997 edition; see also,
United States v. Germaine, 99 U.S.
508 (1879); Norton
v. Shelby County, 118 U.S.
425, 441, 6 S. Ct.
1121 (1886),
and numerous other cases that reinforce the determination
"there can be no officer, either de jure or de facto,
if there be no office to fill.
") Do you disagree?

14.
The Internal Revenue Service is not the "delegate"
of the Secretary of the Treasury, as the term is defined
at 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(12)(A).
Do you disagree?

15.
The Internal Revenue Service operates in an ancillary
or other secondary capacity under contract, memorandum of
agreement or some comparable device to provide services
under original authority delegated to the Treasury Financial
Management Service or some other bureau of the Department
of the Treasury; the contracted or otherwise authorized
services extend only to government employees and employers,
as defined at 26 U.S.C. §§ 3401(c) & (d).
The authorization
is essentially intragovernmental in nature; it does not
extend to private sector population and enterprise in States
of the Union.
Do you disagree?

16.
Internal Revenue Service personnel do not have delegated
authority to execute Form 1040 (individual), 1041 (trust) and
1120 (business/corporation) income tax returns as substitute
returns under authority of 26 U.S.C. § 6020(b). See § [5.
1]
11.
9 of the Internal Revenue Manual currently posted on
the Internal Revenue Service web page.
When there is no
authority to execute these returns as substitute returns,
they are not mandatory.
Do you disagree?

17.
Whenever someone subjected to examination challenges
or otherwise contests fact and/or law issues, examination
officers are required to resolve contested issues or
refer them to the appeals office for resolution.
As an
alternative, the examination officer may request a National
Office Technical Advice Memorandum that provides findings of
fact and conclusions of law. See 26 CFR § 601.105 generally.

Do you disagree?

18.
In the event of an examination in which an examination
officer concludes that there is an income tax liability,
he must issue a 30-day letter that lists particulars of the
proposed deficiency.
The 30-day letter must also inform the
alleged taxpayer of his right to appeal to the examination
officer's manager and to the appeals office.
See 26 CFR
§§ 601.105(c)(2)(i) & (d)(1)(iv).
Do you disagree?

19.
Internal Revenue Service appeals procedure prescribed
in 26 CFR § 601.
106 does not comply with appeals process
required by the Administrative Procedures Act at 5
U.S.C. §§ 553 through 557.
Do you disagree?

20.
The IRS administrative appeals hearing is informal;
there is no provision for the appeals officer to administer
oaths; formal testimony is not taken at IRS appeals hearings;
the appeals officer is not vested with subpoena authority;
the alleged taxpayer is not afforded the opportunity to
cross-examine adverse witnesses placed under oath; and
whether or not the Internal Revenue Service is independently
represented is elective rather than mandatory.
See Federal
Maritime Commission v.
South Carolina State Ports Authority,
et al, No. 01-46, 535 U.S.
___ (2002), decided May 28,
2002, and cases cited therein, for administrative due
process requirements.
Failure to comply with Administrative
Procedures Act provisions concerning administrative appeals
requirements deprives people who have a case or controversy
arising under internal revenue laws of the United States
involving the Internal Revenue Service of procedural due
process rights.
Do you disagree?

21.
Income tax liabilities must be assessed in compliance
with requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 6203 and 26 CFR § 301.
6203-1
before there is a tax liability.
On request, the taxpayer
against whom income tax liabilities are assessed is entitled
to receive the assessment certificate or certificates.
The
law does not authorize computer-generated or other
alternatives. See Hughes v.
United States of America,
953 F.2d 531 (9th Cir.1991).
Do you disagree?

22.
The Secretary is required to issue 10-day notice
and demand for payment after lawful, procedurally proper
assessments are made (26 U.S.C.
§ 6303); there is no
statutory or regulatory authorization for notice and
demand for payment being issued prior to tax liabilities
being assessed in compliance with 26 CFR § 301.6203-1.

Do you disagree?

23.
Prior to any adverse action to collect contested
delinquent tax debts (properly assessed liabilities), the
current general agent of the Treasury and the Attorney
General must authorize litigation.
See particularly,
Executive Order #6166 of June 10, 1933, as amended, 5
U.S.C. § 5512, and 26 U.S.C. § 7401.
(The General Accounting
Office is listed as general agent of the Treasury in notes
following 5 U.S.C.
§ 5512, but appears to have delegated
certification of debts to Government of the United States,
including tax debts, most probably to the Treasury
Financial Management Service or a subdivision thereof).

Do you disagree?

24.
Any statutory lien "arising" under § 6321 of the
Internal Revenue Code is inchoate (unperfected) until there
is a judgment lien from a court of competent jurisdiction
secured in compliance with the Federal Debt Collection
Procedures Act (See Chapter 176 of Title 28, particularly
28 U.S.C. § 3201).
Do you disagree?

25.
Notices of federal tax lien, notices of levy and
other such instruments utilized to encumber and convert
private property are uttered instruments unless perfected
by a judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction.
See
also, Fifth Amendment due process clause, clarified by
relation-back doctrine (See United States v.
A Parcel of
Land, Buildings, Appurtenances and Improvements, known as 92
Buena Vista Avenue, Rumson, New Jersey (1993), 507 U.S.
111;
113 S. Ct.
1126; 122 L. Ed.
2d 469).
Do you disagree?

26.
Garnishment of wages and bank accounts may be executed
only as prejudgment and postjudgment remedies in compliance
with the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, published
as Chapter 176 of Title 28.
See particularly, Fuentes
v.
Shevin, Attorney General of Florida, et al, (1972)
407 U.S.
67, 92 S. Ct.
1983, 32 L. Ed.
2d 556, detailed by
the Supreme Court of the State of Florida decision in Ray
Lien Construction, Inc. v. Jack M.
Wainwrite, (1977) 346
S.
2d 1029, for particulars concerning required notice and
opportunity for hearing.
Do you disagree?

27.
All Internal Revenue Service seizures where there is
not a judgment lien from a court of competent jurisdiction
in place are predicated on the underlying presumption
that a drug-related commercial crime specified in 26
CFR § 403.
38(d)(1) has been committed and that the seized
property was being used in connection with or was the fruit
of the crime.
See particularly, Delegation Order 157,
Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and
26 U.S.C.
§ 7302 (property used in violation of internal
revenue laws).
Do you disagree?

28. The "in rem" action (26 U.S.C.
§ 7323) is admiralty in
nature and presumes that there is a maritime nexus.
Also see
26 U.S.C. § 7327 concerning customs laws.
Do you disagree?

29.
Collateral issues and procedural essentials (nature &
cause of action, standing of the Internal Revenue Service,
venue, subject matter jurisdiction generally, and substantive
and procedural due process rights) are matters that must
be documented in record when challenged.
Do you disagree?

30.
The mandate for disclosure falls within substantive and
procedural rights that cannot be avoided or otherwise passed
over through technicalities or silence. U.S.
Supreme Court
decisions verifying these requirements are too numerous to
list in this context.
Do you disagree?

31.
The Administrative Procedures Act and the Federal
Register Act require publication of organizational
particulars and procedure in the Federal Register.
See
particularly, 5 U.S.C. § 552.
The Internal Revenue Service
has failed to comply with these mandates.
Therefore,
IRS personnel engaged in federal tax administration have
a duty to affirmatively resolve organizational and other
collateral and procedural issues when they are raised in
the administrative forum.
Do you disagree?

32.
Internal Revenue Service personnel acts not authorized
by law and omission of duties imposed by law are criminal in
nature [26 U.S.C. §§ 7214(a)(1), (2) & (3)].
Do you disagree?

33.
Whether knowingly or unknowingly, IRS personnel
operating in States of the Union, except with the possible
exception of authority for enforcing drug-related customs
laws, are involved in a seditious conspiracy and racketeering
enterprise.
Do you disagree?

34.
Where IRS personnel operate under color of authority
of the United States when in reality they are agents of a
government foreign to the United States, offenses may be
construed as treason and conspiracy to commit treason.
See
also, 18 U.S.C.
§ 912 concerning false impersonation of an
officer of the United States.
Do you disagree?




=============================================
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9(or their equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one's job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one's pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
http://www. preferredservices. org/NonconsensualTaking. html

RE: INCOME TAX & FILING A RETURN IS VOLUNTARY - Says the IRS!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: § Lori §
Date: Feb 2, 2008 6:18 PM


From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Feb 2, 2008 5:12 PM


INCOME TAX & FILING A RETURN IS VOLUNTARY - Says the IRS!
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: MAX FAN (LSU/Ron Paul/Cowboys/NASCAR)
Date: Feb 2, 2008 3:04 PM


VERY IMPORTANT! PLEASE COPY & SAVE – Wesley Snipes it’s VOLUNTARY!

Put this in your Freedom or Patriot folder on your computer and keep and spread!

Not only is there no law that requires the average American Citizen wage earner to pay an Income Tax, there is certainly no law that requires one to give up his 5th Amendment Constitutional Right to bear witness against himself as when he files a tax return! When you sign anything UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY you are waving your 5th Amendment Right. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO THIS! Our Founders were protecting us against just such shenanigans as this.

It’s like listening to a cop read you the Miranda Warning (the right to remain silent etc.) when they arrest you and you giving up those rights and talking to them. YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED BY LAW TO DO THIS! PERIOD!

The following information is directly from the Beast’s mouth. These are IRS handbooks I ordered back in the early ‘80’s. The Constitution has not changed since then, so the statements still apply. The IRS knows that they can’t require you to give up your Constitutional Rights, that’s why they tell you, themselves, that filing a return is voluntary! These statements are at the beginnings of each of these books or sections. They spell it out in plain English. They are hoping, I guess, that they’ve successfully dumbed us sheep down to the point that we don’t know what voluntary means or can locate a dictionary to remind us!

Let’s see what the Merriam-Webster dictionary says:

- Voluntary : proceeding from the will or from one's own choice or consent
- Compliance : a: the act or process of complying to a desire, demand, proposal, or regimen or to coercion b: conformity in fulfilling official requirements

So……….. Voluntary Compliance in these IRS matters means – fulfilling official requirements from one’s own choice or consent. IT’S YOUR CHOICE!


** This first photo is from the IRS’ Audit Guidelines Handbook. When they say “Service” they mean the Internal Revenue Service. The underlined parts are what is important.




** These next two are from their Criminal Investigations Handbook.






** These next two are from their Special Agents Handbook. Remember, liquor distillers, tobacco merchants and a few others ARE required to file returns, just not us wage-earning citizens. This is where they try to confuse us. Also, the courts have ruled in tax cases that “shall” means “may.” “Shall” doesn’t mean “required,” it means you may or you may not.






** I wrote my senators and congressman and asked them if we were REQUIRED to file a tax return, and again, the IRS tells my congressman that it’s voluntary. Can you feel the arrogance coming from this squirrel? Can you spot the lies?




** This is an article from the Wall Street Journal. Everyone knows that the Income Tax is voluntary except us sheep at the bottom, I guess! LOL Are there also penalties for not volunteering to contribute to the United Way or Toys for Tots? Can you believe the scam and smoke and mirrors that we have been living under?




** You will not see Voluntary Compliance attached to any “real” law. You won’t find it near laws for Murder, Robbery, TREASON, Kidnapping or Traffic laws. Why? Because the United States Constitution doesn’t protect us from these like it does from Bearing Witness Against Ourselves with our 5th Amendment. The IRS and Congress who writes this crap know the law, this ain’t by mistake! This is by design to keep us enslaved, period! End of discussion! Please pass this on far and wide. We need to return to Constitutional government like Ron Paul espouses. Thanks.







REGISTER TO VOTE

STOP THE NATIONAL I.D.

STOP THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION!

TOM CRYER - LAWYER WHO BEAT THE IRS (Watch all 4 Videos)

RE: An IRS Christmas Offer: Informants. Just like the Nazis used

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: My Hate Speech3
Date: Dec 20, 2007 5:01 AM


An IRS Christmas Offer: Rat Out Your Tax-Cheat Neighbor, Get 30% of the Taxes for Yourself



Informants. Just like the Nazis used!


IRS Provides Interim Whistleblower Guidance
In the spirit of the season, the IRS today announced interim guidance on how taxpayers can report violations of the tax law and claim a reward based on the amount of additional tax, penalties and interest that is owed:

Since the Whistleblower Office was created in December 2006, the IRS has received about 80 claims, half of those submitted in just the last two and a half months. To make a claim, an informant must file new Form 211, Application for Award for Original Information, which asks informants to provide an estimate of the tax owed, the pertinent facts in the case and an explanation of how the informant obtained the information.

The IRS’ Whistleblower Office will make the final determination about whether an award will be paid and the amount of the award for claims that it processes. Awards will be paid in proportion to the value of information furnished voluntarily with respect to proceeds collected.

Under the new procedures, the amount of award will be at least 15%, but no more than 30%, of the collected proceeds in cases in which the IRS determines that the information submitted by the informant substantially contributed to the collection of tax. The award percentage may be reduced in some circumstances, which are described in IRS guidance.

To be eligible for an award under the new procedures, the tax, penalties, interest, additions to tax, and additional amounts in dispute must exceed $2 million for any taxable year and, if the taxpayer is an individual, the individual’s gross income must exceed $200,000 for any taxable year in question.

RE: WHAT HAPPENED ? REPOSTED

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Freeagle
Date: Dec 8, 2007 5:24 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Dec 8, 2007 2:17 PM


RE WHAT HAPPENED ? REPOSTED
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: [Freedom's] angel
Date: Dec 8, 2007 2:14 PM


RE: RE WHAT HAPPENED ? REPOSTED
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: blue eyed angel
Date: Dec 8, 2007 4:53 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Irish~Rose
Date: Dec 8, 2007 1:48 PM


Sourcling

Thanks Mary...yes...this is funny...until you realize it's soooooo true....
mary ska sends missives on high
Date: Dec 8, 2007 3:07 PM


Send this to the Capital.......every emailaddress you can get.





Subject: WHAT HAPPENED?


At first I thought this was funny...then, I realized the awful truth of it. Please, Be sure to read all the way to the end!



Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,

tax his mule
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.
Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries, then
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has,
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers,
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
"Taxes drove me to my doom..."

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
It's time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Invento ry Tax
IRS Interest Charges
IRS Penalties (tax on top of Tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
< B>State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone< / st1:PlaceName State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Per mit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax




STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and Our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We Had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle income group in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What the heck happened?

Can you spell "politicians?" Don't forget to vote for Hillary; she wants to raise your taxes! Someone has to pay for her "universal health care" plus freebies for illegals. Yes, that is YOU!

And, on top of that, we still have to "press 1" for English!!!

I hope this goes around the USA More times than we can count.

Comments
Listing 1-1 of 1 1of 1
From Comment

sad_but_true64

Dec 8, 2007 6:06 PM
The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money. A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of its releases. A. A billion seconds ago it was 1959. B. A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive. C. A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age. D. A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet. E. A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it. While this thought is still fresh in our brain, let's take a look at New Orleans It's amazing what you can learn with some simple division . . Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D), is presently asking the Congress for $250 BILLION to rebuild New Orleans . Interesting number, what does it mean? A. Well, if you are one of 484,674 residents of New Orleans (every man, woman, child), you each get $516,528. B. Or, if you have one of the 188,251 homes in New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787. C. Or, if you are a family of four, your family gets $2,066,012. Washington, D.C .. HELLO!!! ... Are all your calculators broken??

RE: Tax Protestor Ed Brown Gassed, Tortured In Deprivation Tank

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: A Local Revolution (coming 2 UR city) by Leo K.
Date: Oct 17, 2007 6:16 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Brian[RONPAUL2008.COM]
Date: Oct 17, 2007 5:15 PM

Digg

Ed Brown Gassed, Tortured In Deprivation Tank
Tax protester speaks for first time since arrest in prison phone call

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, October 17, 2007

In a disturbing audio clip, Ed Brown speaks for the first time since his arrest and relates how he was gassed by noxious fumes for three days in a detention center as well as being put in a deprivation tank for 15 hours.

Shaun of MaketheStand.com was able to call the Ohio prison that Brown has been incarcerated in and talk with him on the phone for 10 minutes.

Sensory deprivation is a form of torture and extended deprivation can result in extreme anxiety, hallucinations, bizarre thoughts, depression, and antisocial behavior.

Brown also said he had been prevented from making any phone calls or receiving mail.

For the first time, Brown reveals what happened when he was tricked and arrested by U.S. Marshals, including how he was tasered multiple times.

Brown said that he had a chance to fight back during the arrest but that he did not want to hurt anyone.

Brown said his captors were treating him with "professional cruelty" and mentioned that they had also done harrowing things to his wife following her arrest, but refused to go into detail.

"I guess Ed and Elaine Brown, the elderly couple, really rattled their cages, we must be a real terror to the federal government, the corporate structure," said Brown.

Following our article about Ed Brown supporters fearing Brown was being mistreated or tortured, U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier dismissed it, saying, "That's absolutely ludicrous."

From what Ed Brown relates in the audio clip, it's abundantly clear that he is being cruelly mistreated.

Click here to listen to the MP3.

In a related development, Elaine Brown's son David told WMUR News that he has also been prevented from speaking to his mother.

FLASHBACK: Supporters Fear Ed Brown Is Being Tortured

RE: IRS loses challenge to prove tax liability

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: A-Bomb
Date: Jul 26, 2007 12:09 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Blaine
Date: Jul 26, 2007 9:05 AM


THE POWER TO DESTROY
IRS loses challenge to prove tax liability
Lawyer is acquitted after arguing income levy lacks legal foundation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: July 26, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


The Internal Revenue Service has lost a lawyer's challenge in front of a jury to prove a constitutional foundation for the nation's income tax, and the victorious attorney now is setting his sights higher.

"I think now people are beginning to realize that this has got to be the largest fraud, backed up by intimidation and extortion and by the sheer force of taking peoples property and hard-earned money without any lawful authorization whatsoever," lawyer Tom Cryer told WND just days after a jury in Louisiana acquitted him of two criminal tax counts.

And before you consign him to the legions of "tin foil hat brigades" who argue against paying taxes, and then want payment to explain how to do that, he addresses the issue up front.

(Story continues below)
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56855

They're comming to take ME away, he he ha ha ho ho...

RE: "ED BROWN SUPPORTERS WILL BE ROUNDED UP"

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: § Lori §
Date: Jun 29, 2007 4:47 PM


From: Subversionary
Date: Jun 29, 2007 3:42 PM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
Thanks: Save Yr Generation
Date: Jun 29, 2007 3:37 PM


http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2007/06/27/doj-ed-brown-supporters-will-be-rounded-up/

U.S. marshals in New Hampshire have made plans to arrest convicted tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown of Plainfield, along with their supporters, according to an anonymous Justice Department source who also threatened this author with jail.

“Anyone who is going to carry out plans killing officers, agents, and government persons after Ed is arrested is in way over their head,” said the message, which was routed through a proxy server in a failed attempt to obscure its source. “If you continue to pursue these threats, you along with several of your fellow Ed supporters are going to jail. Ed is a convicted felon and several more are going to be rounded up in their stupity [sic].”

Ed and Elaine Brown stopped attending their tax evasion trial in January saying they could not receive a fair trial. They were convicted and sentenced in absentia to 63 months in prison each for various charges of tax evasion and money laundering. Since that time, the couple have remained in their home and vowed to resist with deadly force anyone who attempts to seize them and take them to prison.

Two weeks ago, I said here that while I don’t believe that shooting federal agents is the appropriate thing to do at this time, I support those who would challenge the income tax laws as they amount to nothing more than theft and slavery, and can never be legitimate, no matter how many judges agree.

How some desk jockey at the Department of Justice confused this with a threat of violence, I can’t tell.

Anyway, if you are an Ed Brown supporter, put your affairs in order. They’re probably going to try to take you away, too, whether you have made any threats of violence or not.

RE: Ron Paul on Ed and Elaine Brown (video).

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Jun 25, 2007 9:00 AM


Ron Paul on Ed and Elaine Brown (video).

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Veritas (Latin For Truth)
Date: Jun 25, 2007 5:39 AM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: robert
Date: Jun 25, 2007 5:13 AM


Thanks
THE ANTI SHEEPLE
Joe
Leo/FightNWO-Resisting World Government
Flo
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)



Ron Paul on Ed & Elaine Brown

RE: $4.5 BILLION computer cant decipher 5.8million word Tax Code

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: FREE FALL (Space Beam)
Date: Jun 16, 2007 12:36 PM


Theft By Deception




Starting Over
Roy Blunt
U.S. House of Representatives
Missouri 7th District
The most honorable way to revamp the income tax code is to sunset it out of existence and start over with a clean slate

In 1913, Congress and the States created the federal income tax to pay for America’s growing federal government and its new leadership role in the world. We started with a 30-word constitutional amendment (the Sixteenth) and a four-page form for the collection of graduated income taxes. The lawmakers who wrote the initial income tax law had little idea what it would become today.

With a $20,000 exemption, most Americans (98 percent) didn’t have to pay any income tax while the wealthiest paid from one to seven percent in taxes when the new income tax started. By the late 1970s, Americans in the top tax bracket were paying more than 80 percent of their income to Uncle Sam. Today, the highest marginal tax rate is just less than 40 percent; 54 percent of all federal income tax is paid by the top 20 percent of wage earners; the 20 percent who are the lowest wage earners pay six percent. The tax code has become a monster.

Virtually all businesses, large and small, have a tax accountant to safely maneuver around the pitfalls of the IRS code. But the code is so complicated, even the experts fall prey to its tricks and turns. We spend an estimated 5.4 billion hours a year and $200 billion trying to comply with a code that is incomprehensible. That is more than it takes to produce every car, truck and van in the United States.

The Internal Revenue Service, which was created in 1913, is now the largest single agency of the federal government with more than 135,000 employees which nearly equals the entire population of Springfield, MO, the Congressional district that I represent in Congress.

The American income tax code is perhaps the world’s most revised, lobbied and despised document_ Every year, it seems, it is rewritten. In 1997, more than 200 changes were added. Most professions, industries, income groups, crafts and special interest groups have their own tax niche in the code. It is no wonder that lobbyists watch every change in the tax code microscopically to determine its impact on their turf.

Nothing would eliminate special interest lobbying more quickly than eliminating the current tax code.

If the tax code were based on simple principles rather than intentionally complex legalese, those companies, professions and interest groups would lose their special tax treatment, and therefore, be subject to paying their fair share of the tax burden. A tax code that rewards savings, taxes everyone fairly, is simple and understandable, but does not raise more taxes than the federal government gets now – should be our goal. We can only achieve that by eliminating our current tax code.

The only way to end the IRS as we know it is to eliminate the existing tax code. The current tax code is the evolutionary work of Congress. It’s the job of Congress to fix it. The fairest, most honorable way to revamp the income tax code is to sunset it out of existence and start over with a clean slate. We can then set to work on designing a tax code based on simple principles that every American can understand.

That is impossible today. The tax code is 5.8 million words long, covering 7,000 pages of tax law and 5,000 more pages of interpretations of the first 7,000 pages. The IRS prints 480 different tax forms and more than 280 brochures on how to fill out the forms. The 1040EZ tax form, the least complicated personal income tax form, requires 33 pages of instructions. NO one understands – not even the employees at the IRS who are supposed to enforce it – all the aspects of the American income tax system. It is so cumbersome, dense and complex that it is beyond comprehension. A new $4 billion IRS computer system was declared a "failure" because it could not decipher the tax code.

The IRS has built its reputation of fear and intimidation on the ever-changing tax code. The tax code is like quicksand. You are on solid ground one day and sinking the next. Case after case has been documented to show that IRS tax interpretations are ever-changing and often inconsistent. What is legal one year may be declared illegal the next year, and made retroactive creating years of back tax liability!

Senate hearings in 1997 showed the IRS targeting those least able to defend themselves against egregious fines and improper conduct by the IRS. In fact, the IRS gave bonuses to agents who did the best job of collections, without regard of their tactics or principles.

Tax court is the only civil court where a person is guilty until he can prove he does not owe the taxes the IRS claims.

Reforming the way the IRS collects taxes is coming from both inside the IRS and the Congress. Twenty-eight new "taxpayer rights" have been approved by the House. Most notable are new safeguards that shift the burden of proof from the taxpayers to the IRS about taxes owed. Another provision allows the taxpayer to recover legal fees in fighting frivolous IRS claims. Reforming the IRS may solve some problems, but until the code is replaced with a simple, fair alternative there is little hope of getting the "little guy" out from under the IRS’s guns.

More than 40 percent of the $13 billion in proposed tax fines were dropped in 1996 when challenged as excessive. It is normally the wealthy who have the resources to challenge the taxman. So, middle Americans are being targeted to pay. Is it any wonder that most people would rather pay than fight the IRS? We can never cure these kinds of abuses as long as we have the current tax code. Despite Congressional efforts to make the IRS more professional and user-friendly, it is more likely the agency will stay entrenched and hide behind a tax code that is neither fair nor understandable.

The tax code is 5.8 million words long, covering 7,000 pages of tax law and 5,000 more pages of interpretations of the first 7,000 pages. The IRS prints 480 different tax forms and more than 280 brochures on how to fill out the forms. The 1040EZ tax form, the least complicated personal income tax form, requires 33 pages of instructions.

I’m co-sponsoring the Tax Code Termination Act (HR 3097) which sunsets the federal tax code as of Dec. 31, 2001. We need to debate real tax reform, not just patches to the existing system. The tax code is hopelessly broken and abolishing it is the necessary first step to debating, designing and adopting a simple and fair replacement tax system. Under the Tax Code Termination Act, today’s oppressive tax code would survive for only four more years, at which time it would expire and be replaced on Jan. 1, 2002, with a new tax code that will be determined by Congress, the president and the American people.

Admittedly, scrapping the existing tax code and replacing it with a better system is not a simple task. However, four years is plenty of time for the nation to collectively decide on a new tax system. Having a date certain to end the current tax code will force the issue to the top of the national agenda, where it will remain until Congress and the president finish writing the new tax law.

Between now and 2002, we need to continue eliminating unfair parts of the current tax code. The "marriage penalty," death taxes and taxes on sales of property and stocks not indexed to inflation are wrong. We should knock a few of them off while we debate the kind of fairer, simpler tax structure that we want to take into the 21st century.

If Americans truly want tax reform, it must begin with the creation of a new tax system based on principles, not the ability of lobbyists with armloads of campaign contributions to sway congressional opinion. LL

SPECIAL BULLETIN

The Tax Code Elimination Act passed the U.S. House of Representatives Wednesday, June 17, by a vote of 219 to 209.


http://www.landlinemag.com/Archives/1998/July_August_98/julyaugust98.html

Testing, testing...

RE: Ed Brown: Police, SWAT Team Incident Was "Test"

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Pamela's Protest
Date: Jun 7, 2007 5:19 PM


Ed Brown: Police, SWAT Team Incident Was "Test"
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: josh
Date: Jun 7, 2007 2:11 PM


thank you: Tom wants you to know the truth.



Ed Brown: Police, SWAT Team Incident Was "Test" To See What Response Would Be

New Waco averted as authorities leave after surrounding property

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, June 7, 2007

A new Waco was narrowly averted as law enforcement, APC's
and SWAT team personnel descended on the home of Ed Brown,
the tax protester who has threatened to use force to defend
himself against authorities.

Ed Brown himself states that the
police are now leaving and that media are being allowed
to approach the house.

According to his blog, "apparently
this was a test by the "authorities" to see what
kind of response would come from the community......testing
to see what might happen if they move in......."

This was also confirmed verbally
by the Browns during an appearance on the
RBN radio network.

We received early unconfirmed reports
that the Brown house was on fire - although according to
reports, "Federal authorities indicated Thursday they
will not raid the home of two convicted tax evaders but
would serve a warrant."

Fox
News reports, "The U.S. Marshal's Service
says a supporter of the fugitives was detained near the
Browns' home this morning and that they served a federal
warrant to seize Elaine Brown's dental office in Lebanon."

In addition, it
is being reported that authorities have closed
the airspace above Brown's home and that an AP photographer
was ordered to leave after flying over the property.

Fred Smart, a close friend of the Brown's confirmed that
Brown's phone has been cut and that at around 8:30PM last
night a silent surveillance drone with a bright beaming
light encircled the Brown's property as if conducting reconnaissance.

News reporters have confirmed that police have surrounded
the property and that they were kept away from the property.
Neighbors have been evacuted from their homes.

Officer Jack McLamb attempted to call the Sheriff's office
in the area but was told that he was out of town.

Authorities have been telling reporters that they would
not violently engage the Brown family for the past few months
but this now appears to have been a drill for a potential
future scenario in that mold.

"Dozens of heavily armed state police and federal
agents have assembled near the rural Grafton County home
of tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown."

"About 50 state troopers, some armed with high-powered
rifles, along with a vehicle from the explosives unit gathered
this morning in Plainfield, a small town where Edward and
Elaine Brown have holed up in their home since being convicted
of tax evasion and sentenced to lengthy federal prison terms,"
reports
the Plainfield Union Leader.

More live updates at this
blog.

VIDEO
news report from the scene.

We are encouraging people in the Plainfield area to get
down to the area immediately to see what is happening.

More on this story as it develops.....

RELATED:
SWAT Teams, Armored Vehicle Seen Near Brown Compound

Feds come for Ed and Elaine Brown with guns blazing

RE: Some things that need to be cleared up!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Ed & Elaine
Date: Jun 8, 2007 1:10 PM


Allow me to clear up afew things here.
First of all Reno is NOT a government plant by ANY means!
He IS The REAL Deal and nobody should ever question that ever!
This only takes away from the issue in hand and adds nothing good.
We are all of the same team with the same focus!
Lets keep on track!

I posted last night that the Browns are under attack and 2 or 3 people are calling it a false report then spread it like widefire.
I would have to say when the FEDS shot rounds at the Dan "the Dog walker", that would constitute "Attack" in my book. They have come with overwhelming deadly force and have used it already! The place is surrounded and a alert needed to be sounded so I did as Reno was unable at that time!

Please continue to show your support and go to NH with camereas in hand and whatever else needed for support. If you are unable to make it there then PLEASE post this issue far & wide ALL OVER!

Blessings all and thank you for your support!
Anthony

RE: NH Patriot stands up to fraudulent IRS, stand-off looms

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: El*A*Kwents- Does this look like Freedom?
Date: May 26, 2007 1:12 PM


By Margot Sanger-Katz
Monitor staff
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 22. 2007 8:00AM

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070122/REPOSITORY/701220359

Ed Brown parted ways with his wife last week when he decided not to join her for the conclusion of their federal tax evasion trial. But after barricading himself in his fortified Plainfield home and refusing to surrender to authorities, Brown has amassed a new and growing group of friends who support his decision to stand up to government authority.

Since Brown and his wife were convicted last week, his case has captured the attention of a variety of fringe groups, including Gandhi-admiring protesters who have limited their involvement to building bonfires and waving signs and armed militia members anxious for confrontation. Some appreciate Brown's stand against the federal income tax, some his pointed criticism of the federal courts, and others his willingness to die for his cause. Whatever their reasons, they've all congregated at the sprawling fortress Brown calls home, turning it into a libertarian carnival with an uncertain ending.

"Everybody has their own place on that spectrum," said Dave Ridley of Keene, who has spent several days in Plainfield and positions himself on the nonviolent end. Ridley said he owns a gun but locks it up at home before going to Brown's. "Of course, any group of libertarians has a thousand different opinions."

When news of Brown's decision began circulating on talk radio shows and militia-oriented blogs earlier this week, journalists at the Brown homestead outnumbered supporters. As Brown declared that Plainfield might become another Waco, three strangers huddled in his heated garage and emphasized that they had no interest in shooting anyone.

But as word has spread and the weekend freed many from workday obligations, the number of those camping at the Brown home has swelled. Estimates were difficult to obtain because supporters were spread throughout the house, sleeping in shifts. And some, Brown said, were hidden outside. But several visitors estimated that the number fluctuated between 15 and 30 this weekend.

That group includes one woman who drove an hour to Plainfield and brought Brown a bottle of ginger ale, a carload of young libertarians from Keene and the New York leader of a national anti-tax organization with thousands of members.
Brown said he's been moved by the number and enthusiasm of the supporters he's met since deciding to hole up at home.

"This situation is exploding so fast in this nation and internationally that the Illuminati around the world are becoming very aware," Brown said, referring to a rumored secret society that he believes has infiltrated the highest levels of the world's governments.

Brown and his wife, Elaine, were convicted Thursday of 20 felonies related to the couple's refusal to pay income taxes since 1996. They will be sentenced in April. Elaine Brown, who is cooperating with authorities, has been prohibited from returning to the house. On Friday, the court unsealed a bench warrant for Ed Brown's arrest.

Brown said he's prepared to wait as long as it takes. His home, with its solar panels and private well, was designed to function "off the grid." Brown said he has enough food to last several months, and those provisions are replenished daily as supporters come and go, bringing snacks and takeout dinners with them.

Despite the threat of looming violence, Brown's kitchen was abuzz with activity yesterday afternoon. Young children built forts from the kindling stacked beside his woodstove. Activists shared newsletters on how to avoid paying property taxes and why it's a bad idea to register to vote. Men munched on Doritos, and women poured their children glasses of orange juice. Rob Jacobs of Allenstown prepared to be sworn into the Constitution Rangers of the Continental Congress of 1777, a group charged with holding law enforcement officials accountable to the Constitution.

Over the course of the week, Brown has said repeatedly that he would rather die than submit to federal jurisdiction and that he's readying himself for an armed standoff when the marshals come to arrest him.

But U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier has said his office has no intention of beginning a violent confrontation. Monier said that his officers have been communicating regularly with Brown in hopes of reaching a peaceful resolution.

Several friends and bloggers have been calling for a bloody conclusion to the situation. William Miller, a friend and fellow Constitution Ranger, sent an e-mail last weekend demanding the hanging of the federal judge and prosecutor who worked on Brown's case - and the martyrdom of Brown himself.

"Ed Brown, my friend and mentor, for patriotic reasons, is now worth more to me, and to what I stand for, dead, than alive," Miller wrote.

Brown said that Miller has clarified his position with the marshals and that he does not personally endorse any violence toward court officials. But Miller is not the only Brown supporter making violent proclamations. The Liberty Guard of New America, a militia group, has also called for the murder of the judge.

Supporters at Brown's home said the only violence they anticipated was defensive, but several said that they see a shootout as an inevitability.

"There's been violence throughout our history, and it's sometimes what it takes to right the wrongs." said Bernie Bastian, a close friend of Brown who has been at his side since the trial ended. "It's a shame that men can't right the wrongs without resorting to it."

Other visitors said they were visiting Brown to lend moral support but did not plan to participate in any gun battle. Tim and Marylisa Logsdon spent the weekend at the house with their three young children. Tim Logsdon said he did not feel he was putting his family in any danger.

"The building is pretty secure," he said. "And the feds have promised that they won't raid."

Brown said he was ambivalent about the prospect of violence. He'd prefer a peaceful resolution, he said, but feels that there are few options available to him.

"I would like to see this whole thing go away," he said. "But now's the time it's continuing to build."

------ End of article

By MARGOT SANGER-KATZ


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Scruffy: Enemy Combatant
Date: Jan 22, 2007 10:39 AM


RE: Ed Brown and the standoff- Please Repost!
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Joe
Date: Jan 22, 2007 10:34 AM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Matt
Date: Jan 21, 2007 4:43 PM




Ed Brown lost in federal court his battle "tax evasion" case. Now, he goes for sentencing this April where they'll take him to jail.

BUT ED IS A PATRIOT!

HE KNOWS THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

The Feds now are expected to go to his home and serve a warrant and attempt to take him to jail.

THATS WHAT THEY THINK!

As you see in the picture above, Ed has reinforced his home into a ginormous fortress. He has blocked incoming access on his private road to his house. We all expect this to be a standoff like Waco . . but hopefully it won't go there.

Peacefully, this cannot be resolved and Ed knows that. Ed is more than likely knowing that if he's going down, he's going down in a serious battle.

After doing research, Ed is very educated about our crooked government and has seen Alex Jones films and Aaron Russo's Freedom to Fascism. Keep in mind here that Ed has not broken any Federal laws. He is simply protecting his and OUR rights.

We have to support Ed in this battle against the tyrants!

Do what you can, Email Ed . . Call Ed . . . do whatever it takes! So far, only 10 people have came to stand with Ed . . . . We need more people out there . . . . If you can do it, than please call Ed and let him know.








Forward this video to 9:40




Ed & Elaine Brown
401 Center of Town Road
Plainfield, New Hampshire
Edward.L.Brown@valley.net
603-675-2909


Please contact the Sheriff's office in every way that you can at:
Michael L. Prozzo, Jr.
Sullivan County Sheriff's Office
14 Main St.
P.O. Box 27
Newport, NH 03773
PH 603.863.4200
FAX 603.863.0012
or E-mailsheriff@sullivancounty-nh.com
call 603-863-4200 for the local police station, too.


Please write the Judge at:
Judge McAuliffe,
55 Pleasant
Concord, NH


Contact Elected Officials In Ed Brown's District

Ed Brown Repost

Feds To Court: Seize Tax Evader's Property
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Associated Press February 14, 2007

CONCORD, -- Federal prosecutors are asking a court to seize the property of two convicted tax evaders.

Prosecutors filed papers last week to begin taking the property. A jury last month told Elaine and Ed Brown they must forfeit at least $215,000 in property.

The Browns were convicted last month of failing to pay taxes on almost $2 million in income and engaging in elaborate schemes to hide it. A jury also ordered the couple to turn over their Plainfield home or Elaine Brown's Lebanon dental office.

Ed Brown stopped attending the week-long trial halfway through. Since then, he has been holed up in the couple's fortress-like home.

Elaine Brown, who earned most of the couple's income, attended most of the trial. She remains free on bail and is staying with her son in Worcester, Mass., and is required to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet.
posted by Casey Lee Cobb at 5:40 PM

America Freedom to Fascism Authorized version

Please visit http://www.freedomtofascism.com to purchase the DVD. This is the "Director's Final Cut" authorized version of Aaron Russo's documentary, America: Freedom To Fascism (AFTF). It is being uploaded to Google Video for the first time during the evening of October 19-20th, 2006. Aaron has listened to everyone's feedback - volunteers, students, lovers of freedom & liberty, young and old alike - and, true to his word, he is putting this up "for free" on Google Video knowing that the hour has come for Americans to either be awakened to restore the Republic or be swept aside by the dark global forces of fascism that seeks to enslave mankind. AFTF's main focus comes in a statement with six very simple words: SHUT DOWN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM!! After viewing the movie, please be sure to visit http://www.freedomtofascism.com where you will soon be able to view a much higher quality "pay per view" Internet version of AFTF, buy the DVD and sign up as an affiliate to sell/distribute DVDs to others. We also urge everyone to be sure to sign up as volunteer, register for email alerts and tell your family, friends and neighbors about this groundbreaking movie.