Sunday, April 27, 2008

RE: DHS Chertoff Says Fingerprints Aren’t ‘Personal Data’!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Lori
Date: Apr 17, 2008 10:30 AM


From: DestroyTheRegime
Date: Apr 17, 2008 12:15 PM


RE: DHS Chertoff Says Fingerprints Aren’t ‘Personal Data’!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: juan
Date: Apr 17, 2008 10:08 AM


DHS Chertoff Says Fingerprints Aren’t ‘Personal Data’!

Eddie
That is so full of crap - they are now fingerprinting children, Feds are taking DNA samples from all criminals, next they will RFID chip all of us when US dollar crashes, and those damn 'mark of the beast' will contain ALL OF THESE FREAKING DATAs, what do you think is going on here?

Things are speeding up and they plan to take total control of the entire population, massive food shortage is happening already, when US dollar collapses the only way to buy food water and gas you will have to get CHIPPED, everyone will also get STmicro RFID chip implants to 'prevent' a massive bird flu pandemic - Conspiracy? I THINK NOT

These drastic measures will all usher in the NEW WORLD ORDER

http://www. propagandamatrix. com/articles/april2008/170408Chertoff. htm







Schools to fingerprint US children so they can get their lunch







Roadside fingerprinting by UK cops







Anyone requiring a visa to enter the UK will have to have fingerprint scans and a digital photograph taken from 26 July.







In Rome, it will be necessary to lodge visa applications at the WorldBridge Visa Application Centre (VAC) at Via Antonio Pacinotti 63, where scans and photographs will also be taken







RFID Malaysia biometrics fingerprint

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: juan
Date: Apr 17, 2008 9:49 AM


Chertoff Says Fingerprints Aren’t ‘Personal Data’

Peter Swire / Think Progress | April 16, 2008

Our guest blogger, Peter Swire, is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and served as the Clinton Administration’s Chief Counselor for Privacy

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has badly stumbled in discussing the Bush administration’s push to create stricter identity systems. Chertoff was recently in Canada discussing, among other topics, the so-called “Server in the Sky” program to share fingerprint databases among the U.S., Canada, the U.K.







, and Australia

In a recent briefing with Canadian press (which has yet to be picked up in the U.







S), Chertoff made the startling statement that fingerprints are “not particularly private”:

QUESTION: Some are raising that the privacy aspects of this thing, you know, sharing of that kind of data, very personal data, among four countries is quite a scary thing

SECRETARY CHERTOFF: Well, first of all, a fingerprint is hardly personal data because you leave it on glasses and silverware and articles all over the world, they’re like footprints.







They’re not particularly private

Many of us should rightfully be surprised that our fingerprints aren’t considered “personal data” by the head of DHS. Even more importantly, DHS itself disagrees. In its definition of “personally identifiable information” — the information that triggers a Privacy Impact Assessment when used by government — the Department specifically lists: “biometric identifiers (e.g.







, fingerprints)”

Chertoff’s comments have drawn sharp criticism from Jennifer Stoddart, the Canadian official in charge of privacy issues.







“Fingerprints constitute extremely personal information for which there is clearly a high expectation of privacy,” Stoddart said




There are compelling reasons to treat fingerprints as “extremely personal information.” The strongest reason is that fingerprints, if not used carefully, will become the biggest source of identity theft.







Fingerprints shared in databases all over the world won’t stay secret for long, and identity thieves will take advantage

A quick web search on “fake fingerprints” turns up cheap and easy methods for do-it-at-home fake fingerprints. As discussed by noted security expert Bruce Schneier, one technique is available for under $10. It was tried “against eleven commercially available fingerprint biometric systems, and was able to reliably fool all of them.” Secretary Chertof either doesn’t know about these clear results or chooses to ignore them.







He said in Canada: “It’s very difficult to fake a fingerprint”

Chertoff’s argument about leaving fingerprints lying around on “glasses and silverware” is also beside the point. Today, we leave our Social Security numbers lying around with every employer and numerous others.







Yet the fact that SSNs (or fingerprints) are widely known exposes us to risk

There have been numerous questions raised about how this Administration is treating our personal information.







Secretary Chertoff’s comments show a new reason to worry — they don’t think it’s “personal” at all

Labels: ,

Google

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker