RE: FDA, Supplements And So-Called Hate Crime Bill

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: robert
Date: Apr 26, 2007 8:45 AM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: The Man Common
Date: Apr 26, 2007 5:34 AM

Rock Washington, Dc Now: FDA, Supplements And So-Called Hate Crime Bill

 

 

By: Devvy

Go to Original

I'm going to cut to the chase here on the latest efforts by non elected government bureaucrats and Congress to further destroy our natural rights. First, our right to natural health care and supplements, which cuts into the mega billions of dollars in profit to the big pharmaceutical companies, see Tom DeWeese's recent column:

"The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has launched another sneak-attack, trying to regulate your health freedom into oblivion. Through FDA’s unholy partnerships with Big Pharma and the Codex Alimentarius Commission (an offshoot of the UN), we are very close to losing alternative health care in America. This is a crisis, and needs your immediate action."

The loons behind this new world order nightmare where every aspect of our life is controlled, include water to be regulated! Think I'm blowing some conspiracy junk? "The website noted that among likely developments if the FDA has its way: Growing and selling common garden herbs will get you arrested as a drug dealer. Massage oils and handheld massagers will be regulated as "medical devices." Vegetable juice will be regulated as a drug. Weight machines will be regulated as "medical devices" and require FDA approval before being sold or used. Raw sprouts and other anti-cancer foods will be regulated as drugs. Bottled water that "treats" dehydration will be regulated as a drug....." Read the rest of this factual column here.

Anyone who has done even a minimal amount of research is fully aware that the FDA is nothing more than a pimping operation for the big pharma houses. The question is this: does the FDA have any authority to regulate natural food supplements and vitamins, never mind water? First one has to understand jurisdiction and treaties. Let me quote constitutional attorney, Larry Becraft:

"Control over the possession and sale of any item within the states is not a power possessed by Congress. This was so held in United States v. DeWitt, 76 U.S. 41, 45 (1870), which tested the constitutionality of a federal revenue act making it illegal to sell illuminating oil of a certain flammability. Here, the Court held Congress did not have the power to penalize these sales:

"As a police regulation, relating exclusively to the internal trade of the States, it can only have effect where the legislative authority of Congress excludes, territorially, all state legislation, as, for example, in the District of Columbia. Within state limits, it can have no constitutional operation."

"More than 40 years later, Congress enacted a federal drug law designed to make criminal the possession of contraband drugs like opium. Based upon the decision in DeWitt, the Supreme Court held in United States v. Jim Fuey Moy, 241 U.S. 394 (1916), that Congress did not have power to make penal mere possession of drugs within the states. These two cases have never been reversed, so how did we get the DEA? Like the Fish & Wildlife Service, the origins of this federal agency is also in treaties.

"In 1912, the Senate adopted the International Opium Convention - see 38 Stat. 1912. Later, this convention was supplemented by a similar convention of 1913, the Multilateral Narcotics Drugs Convention, ratified on March 31, 1932, 48 Stat. 1543, which was thereafter implemented by appropriate federal legislation designed to control poppy production within this country. In Stutz v. Bureau of Narcotics, 56 F.Supp. 810, 813 (N.D.Cal. 1944), some poppy growers sought an injunction to enforcement against them of the provisions of the act implementing the convention, their argument being the act invaded the reserved powers of the Tenth Amendment. In rejecting this argument and holding that the act applied within the jurisdiction of California, the Court declared:

"The competency of the United States to enter into treaty stipulations with foreign powers designed to establish, through appropriate legislation, an internationally effective system of control over the production and distribution of habit forming drugs is not questioned. The obligations of the United States incurred as a party to the two Conventions heretofore mentioned were lawfully undertaken in the proper exercise of its treaty making power. And Congress is constitutionally empowered to enact whatever legislation is necessary and proper for carrying into execution the treaty making power of the United States."

"Other cases have also noted that control over drugs by the federal government arises from these treaties - see United States v. Rodriguez-Camacho, 468 F2d. 1220 (9th Cir. 1972); and NORML v. Ingersoll, 497 F2d 654 (D.C.Cir. 1974), later opinion at 559 F2d. 735 (D.C.Cir. 1977). The jurisdiction of the DEA is therefore based upon these drug treaties and it thus has an international jurisdiction. Henry Hudson, Randy Weaver's defendant and the former head of the Marshal's Service, stated as much on his Sunday afternoon radio show in the D.C. area back in March of this year.

"The power of the DEA to control "bad" drugs such as opium and cocaine is constitutionally indistinguishable from the similar power of the FDA to control other "drugs" such as Vitamin B and shark cartilage. If the DEA is a treaty-based federal agency, is it not possible that so is the FDA? As you might expect, the authority of the FDA arises from a 1906 international Agreement for Unification of Pharmacopeial Formulas for Potent Drugs."

The FDA has conducted massive 'destroy the healer' tactics for decades, prosecuting, persecuting and harassing natural health care providers while Congress turns a blind eye and sits on their worthless backsides. The real criminals are those who run the FDA and the Federal Department of Injustice for prosecuting good, decent natural health care providers who teach Americans how to naturally maintain good health and cure diseases naturally, which cuts into the huge profits of the pharmaceutical companies who buy the favors of Congress. Natural products such as B-17 and many others are not "habit forming drugs." It is long past time to stop this Nazi persecution by the FDA and their latest efforts to take away our right to treat ourselves and our bodies. It's time the people told Congress once and for all: we the people DEMAND our right to consume natural health care products, supplements and you people had better stop the FDA from their agenda to take away our right to naturally prevent and cure cancer. Stop this Nazi style persecution of natural health care providers and get U.S. out of the insidious CODEX because we intend to fight you every step of the way, period.

Under the U.S. Constitution, there are only FOUR types of conduct criminal in offense: treason, piracies and felonies on the high seas, counterfeiting, and offenses against the laws of nations. NO WHERE does our right to consume B-17 or other natural health care supplements, vitamins or minerals fall within those categories of criminal offenses. Where is there some crime against nations under any treaty by me consuming natural health care products and supplements? None, zero, zip. Byron Richards has also put together an excellent column on another bill which will give the FDA unprecedented power that MUST BE STOPPED:

"A new attack against health freedom, drug safety, and dietary supplements was launched last week by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) with major support from Michael Enzi (R-WY). It is called the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act (S.1082). This legislation was planned over the past few years working hand-in-glove with the FDA’s dysfunctional management and legal team – meaning this legislation was written for the profits of Big Pharma and Big Biotech at the expense of safety and human health."

Hate crime legislation: Again, it all boils down to jurisdiction by Congress. H.R. 1592 was scheduled for a last hearing on April 24, 2007, but you can still demand your congress critter vote NO. As you will see by the links below, this unconstitutional Nazi style legislation has nothing to do with hate, it is simply another gigantic step by mother government to please certain hot button special interest groups like the wrongly named 'Anti-Defamation League,' sexual deviant organizations and many others. A crime is a crime, period. These craven poltroons in Congress are once again attempting to use interstate commerce as their excuse to legitimize certain PREFERRED sexual behavior and attach a bias to a crime committed by one race against another or against sexual deviants. A crime is a crime and should be punished, period. Should this junk become "law," I firmly believe that with the proper legal challenge, it would be reversed, but we need to stop it from even becoming law. Americans are being bankrupted fighting these unconstitutional laws and it is flat out wrong. Let me once again refer you to Lopez v U.S. and Printz v. U.S. and Richard Mack, two cases which went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, who for once, actually got it right.

In both of these cases regarding interstate commerce, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress over stepped their authority to legislate and I submit to you that these so called "hate crimes" also fall into the same category. Despite endorsement of these special interest bills from factually challenged media hacks like Bill O'Reilly, the Constitution is very specific regarding legislative areas of jurisdiction for Congress. The fact that they have gotten away with passing mountains of unconstitutional junk over the decades to please the poisonous politically correct groups and organizations in this country does not make it right or constitutional. Of course, if you read this bill, the feds also sweeten the pot with federal grant money they have no legal authority to offer. This has nothing whatsoever to do with hate, it has everything to do with control. If you go to the link above regarding interstate commerce, you will see that the sponsors of this garbage are all pro-communism; they call themselves "progressives," but in fact, their political ideology is communism and that is the ultimate goal - the sovietization of these united States of America.

What you must do today: Call (forget e-mail) your federal house member and counterfeit U.S. Senator. Tell them (1) Stop the FDA from unlawfully trying to take away our right to consume and use natural health care products and remedies. We demand the ban against Vitamin B-17 be rescinded. I don't know about you, but I am sick to death of seeing all the misery and death from cancer when we know it can be prevented and successfully eradicated without mutilation or dangerous treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. B-17 was banned decades ago, but I take it every day. How? The natural way from apricots because I refuse to be told by some bureaucrat in Washington, DC, that I cannot take the one natural supplement that I know prevents cancer. (See the column below on world without cancer.) Only the big pharma houses and cancer charities benefit because there's no money in the cure, only the treatment.

(2) Tell these cretins in Congress that H.R. 1592 is beyond their authority to legislate. Demand they vote no. As far as I'm concerned, you can kick the FDA to the curb and let the states handle drugs and natural supplements within their jurisdiction. Demand FDA Commissar, Andrew C. von Eschenbach, M.D., be fired. The FDA wants you to make your comments to them in writing: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. The hell with that, we're out of time. Get on the phone: 1-888-463-6332, press 2.

(3) Tell your counterfeit U.S. Senator to vote NO on S.1082 because we the people will refuse to participate and will fight them. The FDA and food safety? What bunk! The FDA knew about the bad spinach situation, did nothing about it and people died. How many drugs has the FDA approved as "safe" which are now off the market because people have died or suffered massive strokes? Dozens. They are never held responsible, but lawyers are making billions from the lawsuits. Enough! has long since passed. Make those calls, on your lunch hour or while sitting in commute traffic and ask everyone you know to do the same thing. We are the people and we DO have the power to stop these scoundrels, but it takes big numbers.

Important information:

1. Federal jurisdiction (scroll down for a legal analysis which includes supreme court cases, circuit court and state on this critical issue)
2. National Health Federation
3. The Drugging of Our Children - free Internet video

4. Natural Solutions Foundation

5. TVC charges proposed hate crimes bill makes Jesus Christ and his followers criminals
6, Pro-Homosexual/Drag Queen ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill Introduced
7, H.R. 1592 - Could Hate Crimes Bill Tie Hands of Border Patrol?
8, A world without cancer
9, House of Representatives contact
10, Counterfeit U.S. Senate contact
11, States must force 17th Amendment showdown
12, FDA Was Aware of Dangers To Food