What do Google,C.I.A. and I.R.S have in common? You!!!

Friday, December 08, 2006

Category: News and Politics




I was recently enticed into using AdSense by Google for advertisements on my web page. When I decided to see about the money collected, I was made aware of some interesting issues. I don't know if everyone knows the truth about the I.R.S. but because of this issue I thought I better let Google in o the joke before they are sued for extorting money for the I.R.S.. According to the Supreme Court "income" is defined as "profit or gain" from corporate enterprise but we have been fooled into policing and taxing ourselves.

Here is the info from AdSense

Google is legally required to collect U.S. tax information or a statement of No U.S. Activities from all AdSense publishers, including publishers who are based outside of the United States. For more information, please visit our Google AdSense: Tax Information page.

Google cannot be held liable for the tax information you submit. In addition, we're unable to provide tax advice or assistance filling out tax forms. Please refer to http://www.irs.gov or a tax advisor with questions about your tax status.

Google uses industry-standard SSL (secure socket layer) technology to protect this and other personal information you provide us. In addition, taxpayer ID numbers are stored in encrypted format for additional security. Google may share this information with trusted third-parties for the purpose of verifying your identity. Please read the Google Privacy Policy for more information about what we do to protect your privacy.

Here is a copy of the e-mail

To: adsense-support@google.com

Subject: I.R.S.

Body:

I have started an AdSense account and have a problem. The system says that the IRS is requiring you to report on your users even though they have NO authority. Under Title 26 of the I.R.S. code a citizen MUST be notified by the Sec of the Treasury in order to be responsible for keeping records or deducting from a citizen's account. This leaves your company open to civil trial for extortion. Look through your own Google Video for "income tax" and you will see that this is illegal. Ask your IRS rep about this and they will deny it although they cannot even show you the tax code that makes citizens unconstitutionally give their hard earned money to a private bank that does nothing for the country but weaken it.



This is going to be made public to ensure a response and I hope your company can crawl out from under the CIA and make the right choice for yourselves and the country. If you do not take a stand you will be walked on forever!!! I hope this helps your company understand the difference between law and color of law. Upon being notified for the breach of law, If you collect extorted funds for the I.R.S. you and your company will be held responsible for punitive damages as well because you have been notified of the violation of law and Civil Rights.



Thank You


A Concerned User

RE: Government Keeps a Secret After Studying Spy Agencies

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Wendy Bird
Date: Apr 27, 2007 6:53 PM


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/washington/26contracting.html?_r=2&ref=washington&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Government Keeps a Secret After Studying Spy Agencies


Article Tools Sponsored By
By SCOTT SHANE
Published: April 26, 2007

WASHINGTON, April 25 — Concerned about the growing dependence of the nation’s spy agencies on private contractors, top intelligence officials have spent months determining just how many contractors work at the C.I.A., D.I.A., F.B.I., N.S.A. and the rest of the spook alphabet soup.

Now they have an answer. But they cannot reveal it, they say, because America’s enemies might be listening.

Ronald P. Sanders, chief human capital officer for the director of national intelligence, said that because personnel numbers and agency budgets were classified, he could not reveal the contractor count.

“I can’t give you anything that would allow you to impute the size of the I.C. civilian work force,” Mr. Sanders said, using shorthand for “intelligence community” in a telephone briefing that covered everything about the contractor survey except its core findings.

Mr. Sanders said the study did find that about 25 percent of the intelligence work now contracted out resulted from personnel ceilings imposed by Congress. But 25 percent of what, he said he could not disclose.

Steven Aftergood of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, said the decision not to reveal the numbers was a sign of dysfunctional policies.

“It reveals how confused the government is about what is really sensitive and what is not,” Mr. Aftergood said. “What would Osama bin Laden do with the fraction of intelligence workers who are contractors? Absolutely nothing.”

The government’s use of contractors has accelerated greatly during the Bush administration. Nowhere has the increase been more striking than in the spy agencies, like Central Intelligence, Defense Intelligence and National Security, whose budgets were cut sharply in the 1990s and then faced huge new demands after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees have expressed concern about the cost of contracting and its impact on agencies in luring away skilled employees. The intelligence director’s office set out last year, as a first step, to get a handle on the scale of contracting.

The agencies have long fought efforts to make public their budgets and work force numbers.

But not all officials have been punctilious about keeping the secrets. At a conference in 2005, Mary Margaret Graham, a deputy director of national intelligence, let slip that the annual spy budget was $44 billion. Last year, John D. Negroponte, then the intelligence director, said in a speech “almost 100,000 patriotic, talented and hard-working Americans” work for the agencies.

Why was Mr. Negroponte permitted to reveal that number? “It was an estimate,” said Ross Feinstein, a spokesman for the current intelligence chief, Mike McConnell.

Asked why no estimate of contractors can be revealed, Mr. Feinstein said in a statement: “Administrations and Congressional majorities of both parties have supported classifying intelligence budgets, personnel and contractor numbers to protect our national security interests.”